R v Hagan [2019] NSWSC 128
The offender pleaded guilty to being an accessory after the fact to murder, admitted two key acts that assisted the principal offender, and received discounts for plea and undertakings to assist authorities. Despite subjective factors, the objective seriousness demanded a sentence of imprisonment, set at four years nine months with a non-parole period of three years, fully backdated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Conviction and sentence imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['accessory After the Fact to Murder' 'sentencing' 'plea of Guilty' 'assistance to Authorities' 'objective Gravity' 'moral Culpability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for being an accessory after the fact to murder' 'Consideration of plea of guilty and assistance to authorities in sentencing' 'Assessment of objective gravity and moral culpability']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender pleaded guilty to being an accessory after the fact to murder, admitted two key acts that assisted the principal offender, and received discounts for plea and undertakings to assist authorities. Despite subjective factors, the objective seriousness demanded a sentence of imprisonment, set at four years nine months with a non-parole period of three years, fully backdated.
Court Disposition
Conviction and sentence imposed
Orders
- ['Convicted of being an accessory after the fact to murder.' 'Sentenced to a non-parole period of three years, commencing 7 November 2017 and expiring 6 November 2020.' 'Parole period of one year nine months, expiring 6 August 2022.' 'Head sentence of four years nine months, backdated to 7 November 2017.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment