SafeWork NSW v Aceline Plumbing Group Pty Ltd [2020] NSWDC 774
The defendant, as a licensed plumbing company, breached its statutory duties by (1) failing to notify SafeWork NSW immediately following a notifiable workplace incident resulting in serious injury, and (2) failing to consult, co-operate, and co-ordinate with other relevant duty holders to eliminate or minimise foreseeable health and safety risks, particularly in relation to the risk of falls when installing guttering. The breaches were objectively serious, as simple and practical measures to ameliorate the risk were reasonably available and not taken. The company also failed to provide any credible evidence of remorse beyond admissions or of improvement in safety systems.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: SafeWork NSW; Defendant: Aceline Plumbing Group Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentence
- Outcome
- The defendant is convicted and fined.
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Persons Conducting a Business or Undertaking, Notification of Notifiable Incidents, Consultation, Co Operation and Co Ordination With Other Duty Holders, Sentencing for Work Health and Safety Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SafeWork NSW
Prosecutor
Aceline Plumbing Group Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant failed to notify the regulator immediately after becoming aware of a notifiable incident arising out of its business or undertaking
- 2 Whether the defendant failed to consult, co-operate and co-ordinate activities with other persons who had a duty under s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant, as a licensed plumbing company, breached its statutory duties by (1) failing to notify SafeWork NSW immediately following a notifiable workplace incident resulting in serious injury, and (2) failing to consult, co-operate, and co-ordinate with other relevant duty holders to eliminate or minimise foreseeable health and safety risks, particularly in relation to the risk of falls when installing guttering. The breaches were objectively serious, as simple and practical measures to ameliorate the risk were reasonably available and not taken. The company also failed to provide any credible evidence of remorse beyond admissions or of improvement in safety systems.
Court Disposition
The defendant is convicted and fined.
Orders
- The defendant is convicted.
- The appropriate fine for the s 38 offence is $40,000.00, reduced by 25% to $30,000.00 to reflect a plea of guilty.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment