ACF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1902

ACF17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1902

The application for extension of time was dismissed because the proposed ground of appeal, alleging procedural unfairness for failure to consider the absence of familial support for bail in Sri Lanka, lacked merit. The Authority's decision was open on the evidence, and there was no express claim by the applicant that no family member could act as guarantor. The Authority's reasoning did not require a positive finding on that issue, and no jurisdictional or material error was established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 November 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Ruling on Extension of Time Application
Outcome
Application for extension of time dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'material Questions of Fact' 'protection Visa' 'fast Track Review Process']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'material Questions of Fact' 'protection Visa' 'fast Track Review Process']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Ruling on Extension of Time Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the court should grant an extension of time to appeal against the judgment of the Federal Circuit Court regarding a protection visa refusal' 'Whether the proposed ground of appeal – procedural unfairness for failure to consider evidence regarding lack of familial support for bail in Sri Lanka – had merit']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time was dismissed because the proposed ground of appeal, alleging procedural unfairness for failure to consider the absence of familial support for bail in Sri Lanka, lacked merit. The Authority's decision was open on the evidence, and there was no express claim by the applicant that no family member could act as guarantor. The Authority's reasoning did not require a positive finding on that issue, and no jurisdictional or material error was established.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application, to be fixed by way of a lump sum." "Within 14 days, the parties file any agreed proposed minutes of orders fixing a lump sum in relation to the first respondent's costs." 'If no agreement:...