ACM Landmark Pty Limited v Cessnock City Council [2007] NSWLEC 429
The amended plans reasonably comply with current planning controls, and the amenity impacts on adjoining properties are reasonable. The development merits conditional consent, as supported by the s 79C assessment, and there was no substantive challenge to that assessment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld, development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'multiple Unit Housing' 'urban Design' 'residential Amenity' 'solar Access' 'traffic' 'impact on Neighbours']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Compatibility of proposed development with planning controls' "Impact on neighbours' solar access and privacy" 'Adequacy of boundary fencing' 'Drainage issues' 'Traffic and access concerns' "Public interest considering neighbours' objections"]
Ratio Decidendi
The amended plans reasonably comply with current planning controls, and the amenity impacts on adjoining properties are reasonable. The development merits conditional consent, as supported by the s 79C assessment, and there was no substantive challenge to that assessment.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld, development consent granted
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to DA No 8/2004/606/1 for the demolition of structures on the site and construction of a 23 unit multiple dwelling development at Nos 82A and 88 Alexandra Street, Kurri Kurri subject to the conditions in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits may be returned except for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment