ACM17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1051

ACM17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2023] FCA 1051

The statutory definition of 'excluded fast track review applicant' under s 5(1)(a)(iii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) is satisfied if the appellant has made a previous claim for protection in a country other than Australia that was refused by that country, regardless of whether the previous claim is substantially similar to the current claim in Australia; therefore, the appellant is not entitled to merits review by the Immigration Assessment Authority.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 September 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'statutory Interpretation' 'judicial Review' 'fast Track Review System']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['protection Visa' 'statutory Interpretation' 'judicial Review' 'fast Track Review System']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the appellant is an 'excluded fast track review applicant' under s 5(1)(a)(iii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)" 'Whether prior protection claims in Germany and the United Kingdom, which were refused, preclude merits review by the Immigration Assessment Authority' 'Whether similarity between previous protection claims and the current claim is required under the statutory definition']

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory definition of 'excluded fast track review applicant' under s 5(1)(a)(iii) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) is satisfied if the appellant has made a previous claim for protection in a country other than Australia that was refused by that country, regardless of whether the previous claim is substantially similar to the current claim in Australia; therefore, the appellant is not entitled to merits review by the Immigration Assessment Authority.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ["The name of the respondent amended to 'Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs'." 'The appeal dismissed.' "The appellant to pay the respondent's costs, as agreed or taxed."]