ACN 153 364 491 Ltd (in liq) v GP No 1 (in liq), in the matter of GP No 1 (in liq) [2018] FCA 1933
Security for costs in the amount of $15,000 should be provided by the plaintiff because it is in liquidation, has no available funds to pay a potential costs order, and the discretion under s 1335(1) is engaged; the fact that the impecuniosity is due to the defendants’ non-payment does not preclude the making of an order for security. Security will not be refused merely because it might stifle the proceedings where the statutory requirements are satisfied and the other discretionary matters do not outweigh the interests of justice.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: ACN 153 364 491 Ltd (in liquidation); First Defendant: GP No 1 Pty Ltd (in liquidation); Second Defendant: Gavin Moss
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory (application for Security for Costs)
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs granted; plaintiff to provide security for costs in the amount of $15,000. No final orders made at this stage; parties to be heard as to the appropriate orders.
- Legal Topics
- Security for Costs, Liquidation, Priority of Creditors, External Administration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ACN 153 364 491 Ltd (in liquidation)
Plaintiff
GP No 1 Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
First Defendant
Gavin Moss
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory (application for Security for Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff (a company in liquidation) should be ordered to provide security for costs under s 1335 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether there is credible evidence that the plaintiff will be unable to pay the defendants' costs if so ordered
- 3 Whether ordering security for costs would stifle the proceedings given the plaintiff's impecuniosity
Ratio Decidendi
Security for costs in the amount of $15,000 should be provided by the plaintiff because it is in liquidation, has no available funds to pay a potential costs order, and the discretion under s 1335(1) is engaged; the fact that the impecuniosity is due to the defendants’ non-payment does not preclude the making of an order for security. Security will not be refused merely because it might stifle the proceedings where the statutory requirements are satisfied and the other discretionary matters do not outweigh the interests of justice.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs granted; plaintiff to provide security for costs in the amount of $15,000. No final orders made at this stage; parties to be heard as to the appropriate orders.
Orders
- The parties be heard as to the appropriate orders to be made in light of these reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment