A.C.N. 627 087 030 Pty Ltd atf The YBL Trust v Elisabeth Theodore; A.C.N. 627 087 030 Pty Ltd atf The YBL Trust v Andrew John Price [2024] NSWDC 592
The Review Panel erred in law by holding that initial costs disclosure and updating estimates required a single figure rather than a range or breakdown, as this is not mandated by s 174 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law. The Review Panel also erred in finding all costs relating to the Guardianship Proceedings were not fair and reasonable, in light of the evidence supporting the urgency and reasonableness of commencing proceedings. However, the Review Panel did not err in holding that disclosure was not provided as soon as practicable regarding the Guardianship Proceedings. Unchallenged Review Panel findings stand unless the Court identifies material error, and a full re-assessment is...
- Parties
- Plaintiff: A.C.N. 627 087 030 Pty Ltd atf The YBL Trust; Defendant 1: Elisabeth Theodore; Defendant 2: Andrew John Price
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal – Legal Costs Assessment / Appeal From a Decision of a Costs Assessment Review Panel Pursuant to S 89 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (nsw)
- Outcome
- Partially allowed; matter stood over for further directions as to computation of sums due in light of reasons; parties directed to agree mathematical consequences of findings.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal From Costs Assessment Review Panel, Solicitor/client Costs, Costs Disclosure Obligations, Leave to Adduce Further Evidence on Appeal, Practice and Procedure – Interlocutory Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A.C.N. 627 087 030 Pty Ltd atf The YBL Trust
Plaintiff
Elisabeth Theodore
Defendant 1
Andrew John Price
Defendant 2
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal – Legal Costs Assessment / Appeal From a Decision of a Costs Assessment Review Panel Pursuant to S 89 Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original costs disclosure complied with s 174 Legal Profession Uniform Law 2014 (NSW)
- 2 Whether updating estimates were provided as soon as practicable
- 3 Whether costs for the Guardianship Proceedings were fair and reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The Review Panel erred in law by holding that initial costs disclosure and updating estimates required a single figure rather than a range or breakdown, as this is not mandated by s 174 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law. The Review Panel also erred in finding all costs relating to the Guardianship Proceedings were not fair and reasonable, in light of the evidence supporting the urgency and reasonableness of commencing proceedings. However, the Review Panel did not err in holding that disclosure was not provided as soon as practicable regarding the Guardianship Proceedings. Unchallenged Review Panel findings stand unless the Court identifies material error, and a full re-assessment is...
Court Disposition
Partially allowed; matter stood over for further directions as to computation of sums due in light of reasons; parties directed to agree mathematical consequences of findings.
Orders
- Stand the matter over to a date in February 2025 for directions.
- Direct the parties in the meantime to seek to agree as to the mathematical consequences of the Court's reasons, as summarised at para [152].
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment