ACOHS Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd (No.2) [2009] FCA 1074
The amendment sought by the applicant to its Statement of Claim relates to issues already raised or depending on the proceeding, specifically the question whether each MSDS is a copyright work. As such, O 13 r 2(2) requires that leave to amend be granted and leaves the court no discretion to refuse the amendment if the stated precondition is satisfied.
- Parties
- Applicant: ACOHS Pty Ltd (ACN 009 572 187); First Respondent: Ucorp Pty Ltd (ACN 062 768 094); Second Respondent: Bernard Bialkower
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property Copyright / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim During Trial
- Outcome
- Leave to amend Statement of Claim granted
- Legal Topics
- Copyright, Pleadings, Amendment of Pleadings, Civil Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ACOHS Pty Ltd (ACN 009 572 187)
Applicant
Ucorp Pty Ltd (ACN 062 768 094)
First Respondent
Bernard Bialkower
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Copyright / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should have leave to amend its Statement of Claim under O 13 r 2(2) of the Federal Court Rules
- 2 Whether the amendments are necessary for determining the real questions raised by the proceeding
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment sought by the applicant to its Statement of Claim relates to issues already raised or depending on the proceeding, specifically the question whether each MSDS is a copyright work. As such, O 13 r 2(2) requires that leave to amend be granted and leaves the court no discretion to refuse the amendment if the stated precondition is satisfied.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend Statement of Claim granted
Orders
- The applicant have leave to amend its Sixth Further Amended Statement of Claim by the replacement of subparagraph (b) of paragraph 8 thereof with the following: 'Each MSDS in Annexure A and Annexure A1 having its layout, presentation and appearance in accordance with one or other of the templates in Annexure B.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment