ACP -v- Southdown [2001] NSWSC 273
Restraining orders are appropriate pending the determination of News' application for leave to appeal, as protection for News against prejudice from a prolonged inspection outweighs any hardship to ACP, given the short period until leave is determined.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Order Pending Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; restraining orders made pending leave to appeal; applicant to pay respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunctions' 'stay of Execution' 'construction of Deed']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Interlocutory Order Pending Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether restraining orders should be granted pending determination of leave to appeal' "Whether 'inspection' under clause 5 of the deed permits notes and copies" 'Whether there is a seriously arguable question on appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
Restraining orders are appropriate pending the determination of News' application for leave to appeal, as protection for News against prejudice from a prolonged inspection outweighs any hardship to ACP, given the short period until leave is determined.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; restraining orders made pending leave to appeal; applicant to pay respondent's costs.
Orders
- ['Plaintiff, by Chairman or nominee, restrained from acting with assistants when inspecting books and records of TV Week under clause 5 of Deed dated 6 August 1980.' 'Plaintiff, by Chairman or nominee, restrained from making notes (in hard copy, electronic form, or using an electronic recording device) of or in...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment