Actall Pty Ltd v Pacific Bay Development Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 190
The vendor did everything reasonable required by the contract to have the plan registered, and its rescission was in accordance with the expressly agreed contractual terms; mere pursuit of financial benefit does not render an otherwise contractually valid rescission unconscientious.
- Parties
- Appellant: Actall Pty Ltd; Respondent: Pacific Bay Development Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Supreme Court Equity Division
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Subdivided Land, Contract Subject to Registration of Plan, Vendor's Right to Rescind, Reasonableness of Vendor's Actions, Unconscientious Rescission, Standard Contract for the Sale of Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Actall Pty Ltd
Appellant
Pacific Bay Development Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Supreme Court Equity Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the vendor did 'everything reasonable' to have the plan registered by the registration date as required by the contract
- 2 Whether the rescission by the vendor was unconscientious/bad faith and for an ulterior purpose
Ratio Decidendi
The vendor did everything reasonable required by the contract to have the plan registered, and its rescission was in accordance with the expressly agreed contractual terms; mere pursuit of financial benefit does not render an otherwise contractually valid rescission unconscientious.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay respondent's costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment