Activistic Limited, in the matter of Activistic Limited [2016] FCA 1520
The Court found that the plaintiff's failure to comply with the statutory deadline was inadvertent, that the error was quickly recognised and addressed, and that no prejudice would result to any party from granting the extension. Therefore, it was appropriate to grant the extension of time for compliance.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Activistic Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application / Application for Extension of Time Under Corporations Act
- Outcome
- Application granted; orders made extending time for compliance.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Compliance With Statutory Requirements, Section 625(3)(c)(i) Corporations Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Activistic Limited
Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application / Application for Extension of Time Under Corporations Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether time for compliance with s 625(3)(c)(i) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) should be extended under ss 1322(4)(d) and 1325A
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the plaintiff's failure to comply with the statutory deadline was inadvertent, that the error was quickly recognised and addressed, and that no prejudice would result to any party from granting the extension. Therefore, it was appropriate to grant the extension of time for compliance.
Court Disposition
Application granted; orders made extending time for compliance.
Orders
- The time for service and hearing of the application be abridged.
- For purposes of the plaintiff's off-market takeover offer, the time for compliance with s 625(3)(c)(i) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) be extended to 25 November 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment