Taylor v Local Court of NSW [2014] NSWSC 1062
The magistrate's refusal to grant an adjournment, especially without an oral hearing and in the absence of all relevant information, denied Mr Taylor procedural fairness, justifying the orders of certiorari and prohibition.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Judicial Review Regarding Refusal to Adjourn
- Outcome
- Application granted. Decision refusing adjournment quashed. Matter remitted for further determination. Costs awarded to the plaintiff against the second defendant.
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'adjournment of Criminal Proceedings' 'procedural Fairness' 'prerogative Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Judicial Review Regarding Refusal to Adjourn
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether refusal to grant an adjournment in chambers without oral hearing denied procedural fairness' 'Whether the court should grant orders of certiorari and prohibition in the circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate's refusal to grant an adjournment, especially without an oral hearing and in the absence of all relevant information, denied Mr Taylor procedural fairness, justifying the orders of certiorari and prohibition.
Court Disposition
Application granted. Decision refusing adjournment quashed. Matter remitted for further determination. Costs awarded to the plaintiff against the second defendant.
Orders
- ["Order in the nature of certiorari quashing the magistrate's decision refusing adjournment." 'Order in the nature of prohibition precluding hearing until adjournment application is determined in open court.' 'Proceedings remitted to Local Court for determination in accordance with this judgment.' "Second defendant...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment