Regina v Adam Maxwell Cook [2002] NSWCCA 216

Regina v Adam Maxwell Cook [2002] NSWCCA 216

The sentencing judge was not required to find special circumstances; the applicant's combination of circumstances was not sufficiently special to justify varying the statutory proportion between non-parole period and head sentence. There was no error in the sentencing discretion exercised, and the non-parole period was not manifestly excessive.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentence' 'appeal Against Severity' 'large Commercial Quantity of Cocaine' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']
['criminal Law'] ['sentence' 'appeal Against Severity' 'large Commercial Quantity of Cocaine' 'special Circumstances' 'non Parole Period']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred in failing to find 'special circumstances' within the meaning of s 44(2) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999" 'Whether the length of the non-parole period was appropriate' 'Whether any other sentence was warranted in law']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge was not required to find special circumstances; the applicant's combination of circumstances was not sufficiently special to justify varying the statutory proportion between non-parole period and head sentence. There was no error in the sentencing discretion exercised, and the non-parole period was not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']