Nicol v Trazmet & Waterways & State Transit [2003] NSWCC 4
On balance, the applicant was injured at work on 19 June 2000 in the employ of the second respondent, aggravating a pre-existing back condition and resulting in partial incapacity. Compensation is awarded based on difference in earning capacity and assessed permanent impairment, with two-thirds deduction for pre-existing condition.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Compensation Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- compensation awarded against second respondent; third respondent discharged
- Legal Topics
- ['assessment of Compensation' 'aggravation of Pre Existing Injury' 'partial Incapacity' 'loss of Earning Capacity' 'entitlement to Interest' 'medical Expenses']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Compensation Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant suffered injury arising out of employment with the second respondent on 19 June 2000' 'Whether permanent impairment or loss resulted from employment with any respondent' 'Assessment and deduction of impairment due to pre-existing condition' 'Entitlement to weekly benefits' 'Entitlement to lump sum compensation' 'Entitlement to medical expenses and interest']
Ratio Decidendi
On balance, the applicant was injured at work on 19 June 2000 in the employ of the second respondent, aggravating a pre-existing back condition and resulting in partial incapacity. Compensation is awarded based on difference in earning capacity and assessed permanent impairment, with two-thirds deduction for pre-existing condition.
Court Disposition
compensation awarded against second respondent; third respondent discharged
Orders
- ['Award against the second respondent in sum of $237.20 per week, as adjusted, from 8 November 2000 to date and continuing' 'Order for interest at 4% on accrued weekly benefits from date of claim' 'Award against the second respondent pursuant to s 66 in sum of $4,250' "Order for second respondent to pay applicant's...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment