Adam Robert BELL v R [2007] NSWCCA 369
The appeal was incompetent because the only outstanding sentences related to further offences adjourned to the Drug Court not for determination under Pt 2 of the Drug Court Act 1998, but for summary disposal under the Local Court jurisdiction conferred by s24; therefore s5AF of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 did not give the Court of Criminal Appeal jurisdiction to deal with those sentences.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal From Drug Court Sentences / Appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal; Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal From Drug Court Sentences' 'jurisdiction of the Court of Criminal Appeal' 'drug Court Program' 'summary Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal From Drug Court Sentences / Appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeal; Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court of Criminal Appeal had jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from outstanding sentences imposed by the Drug Court for summary matters or indictable matters dealt with summarily.' 'Whether the outstanding sentences were imposed by the Drug Court in the exercise of jurisdiction under Pt 2 of the Drug Court Act 1998 so as to engage s5AF of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was incompetent because the only outstanding sentences related to further offences adjourned to the Drug Court not for determination under Pt 2 of the Drug Court Act 1998, but for summary disposal under the Local Court jurisdiction conferred by s24; therefore s5AF of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 did not give the Court of Criminal Appeal jurisdiction to deal with those sentences.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment