Murray v R [2015] NSWCCA 75
The sentencing judge's firmly held belief regarding the applicant's guilt on a prior acquitted charge, and his explicit difficulty in disregarding that matter, gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. Denial of a utilitarian discount without warning further compounded the procedural flaw. The sentence imposed must be set aside and the matter remitted for sentencing according to law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, sentence set aside, matter remitted for re-sentencing
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'apprehension of Bias' 'procedural Fairness' 'appeal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge should have recused himself for apprehended bias' 'Whether denial of a utilitarian discount for a guilty plea without notice constituted denial of procedural fairness' 'Whether the sentence imposed should be set aside and remitted']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge's firmly held belief regarding the applicant's guilt on a prior acquitted charge, and his explicit difficulty in disregarding that matter, gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. Denial of a utilitarian discount without warning further compounded the procedural flaw. The sentence imposed must be set aside and the matter remitted for sentencing according to law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, sentence set aside, matter remitted for re-sentencing
Orders
- ['Grant the applicant leave to appeal against the sentence imposed upon him in the District Court on 7 August 2013.' 'Allow the appeal and set aside the sentence imposed by the District Court on 7 August 2013 at Wollongong.' 'Remit the matter to the District Court for sentencing the offender, according to law.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment