SHAABAN v REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 115

SHAABAN v REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 115

No error, either identifiable or manifest, was disclosed in the sentencing process. All relevant matters were properly considered. The sentence imposed was within reasonable range taking into account the discounts and findings of special circumstances.

Parties
Applicant: Adam SHAABAN; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal; Hearing; Judgment
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Appeal, Sentencing, Ongoing Supply of Prohibited Drug, Parole
Criminal Law Appeal Sentencing Ongoing Supply of Prohibited Drug Parole

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adam SHAABAN

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal; Hearing; Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether sentencing judge erred in taking into account subjective circumstances
  3. 3 Whether assistance to authorities warranted a different sentence

Ratio Decidendi

No error, either identifiable or manifest, was disclosed in the sentencing process. All relevant matters were properly considered. The sentence imposed was within reasonable range taking into account the discounts and findings of special circumstances.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal be granted.
  • Appeal be dismissed.