Daykin v SAS Trustee Corporation [2001] NSWSC 58
Where the Appeal Panel of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal includes a Judge of the District Court, an appeal under s 119 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 must be commenced in the Court of Appeal, not in the Administrative Law List of the Common Law Division.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel / Preliminary Motion Concerning Proper Appeal Forum
- Outcome
- Orders for proceedings to be removed into the Court of Appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Forum Assignment' 'administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeals' 'specified Tribunal Definition']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel / Preliminary Motion Concerning Proper Appeal Forum
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an appeal under s 119 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (NSW) from an Appeal Panel comprising a District Court Judge should be commenced in the Court of Appeal or the Administrative Law List of the Common Law Division']
Ratio Decidendi
Where the Appeal Panel of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal includes a Judge of the District Court, an appeal under s 119 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 must be commenced in the Court of Appeal, not in the Administrative Law List of the Common Law Division.
Court Disposition
Orders for proceedings to be removed into the Court of Appeal.
Orders
- ['Proceedings are removed into the Court of Appeal.' 'Matter to be listed for directions before the Registrar of the Court of Appeal on a date to be fixed.' "Costs of today's proceedings to be costs in the cause."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment