McGrory v R [2018] NSWCCA 149
Leave was refused because Mr Eaton did not provide documentation proving eligibility to appear, and no evidence was provided of supervision as required under s 49 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Adjourned Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal adjourned
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'leave to Appear by Solicitor With Restricted Practising Certificate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Adjourned Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to a solicitor with a restricted practising certificate to represent the applicant' 'Whether the applicant can proceed with the appeal unrepresented']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave was refused because Mr Eaton did not provide documentation proving eligibility to appear, and no evidence was provided of supervision as required under s 49 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW).
Court Disposition
Appeal adjourned
Orders
- ['Leave for Mr Eaton to appear refused' 'Appeal adjourned']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment