ADAMS v ALEMITE LUBREQUIT PTY LIMITED [1995] NSWCA 7

ADAMS v ALEMITE LUBREQUIT PTY LIMITED [1995] NSWCA 7

The distinction between the facts as stated in the application and those in the reasons for judgment is not material to the outcome; therefore, the application is dismissed with costs.

Parties
Appellant: Adams; Respondent: Alemite Lubrequit Pty Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 May 1995
Procedural Posture
Application to Reconsider Judgment / Post Judgment Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adams

Appellant

Alemite Lubrequit Pty Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application to Reconsider Judgment / Post Judgment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an erroneous statement of fact in the reasons for judgment affects the outcome of the case

Ratio Decidendi

The distinction between the facts as stated in the application and those in the reasons for judgment is not material to the outcome; therefore, the application is dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • application dismissed with costs