Adele Crane v Spanline Weatherstrong Building Systems Pty Ltd [1995] IRCA 414
Leave to amend the claim to add damages for breach of contract in the associated jurisdiction is refused due to jurisdictional limitations and procedural appropriateness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Application for Leave to Amend Claim
- Outcome
- Application for leave to amend claim refused
- Legal Topics
- ['termination of Employment' 'unlawful Termination' 'practice and Procedure' 'amendment of Pleadings' 'associated Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Application for Leave to Amend Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the application by adding a claim for damages for breach of contract in the associated jurisdiction']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the claim to add damages for breach of contract in the associated jurisdiction is refused due to jurisdictional limitations and procedural appropriateness.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to amend claim refused
Orders
- ['The application for leave to amend pursuant to the notice of motion filed on 14 August 1995 is refused.' 'Proceed to hear the claim pursuant to section 170EA of the Act.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment