Wheatley v Salmon [2022] NSWSC 395

Wheatley v Salmon [2022] NSWSC 395

The court found Adele Wheatley did not prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the alleged representation by Gregory Salmon was made that would entitle her to a proprietary interest in the property. Even on her own evidence, the arrangement was too ambiguous and Adele's assumption of acquiring ownership was a hope, not a result of any clear promise. She did not change her position in reliance on a representation sufficient to found estoppel, thus proprietary estoppel by encouragement was not established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Equity / Principal Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed. Court will entertain application for possession if parties cannot agree on timing of vacation.
Legal Topics
['proprietary Estoppel' 'estoppel by Encouragement' 'constructive Trust']
['equity'] ['proprietary Estoppel' 'estoppel by Encouragement' 'constructive Trust']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity / Principal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a proprietary estoppel by encouragement was made out.' 'Whether the plaintiff formed an assumption she would have a proprietary interest in the property.' 'Whether the alleged representation was sufficiently certain to found estoppel.' 'Whether the plaintiff changed her position in reliance on the alleged representation.']

Ratio Decidendi

The court found Adele Wheatley did not prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the alleged representation by Gregory Salmon was made that would entitle her to a proprietary interest in the property. Even on her own evidence, the arrangement was too ambiguous and Adele's assumption of acquiring ownership was a hope, not a result of any clear promise. She did not change her position in reliance on a representation sufficient to found estoppel, thus proprietary estoppel by encouragement was not established.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed. Court will entertain application for possession if parties cannot agree on timing of vacation.

Orders

  • ['Proceedings dismissed.' 'If no agreement reached, defendants may file cross-claim for possession and court to hear parties on timing and conditions.' 'Parties may address costs if not agreed.']