Alam & Ors v Giampietro t/as Legal & Company Solicitors [2019] NSWDC 179
The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate 'very good reasons' for adjourning the hearing, particularly where the third plaintiff was able to participate in other proceedings at the same time. The motion was therefore dismissed and costs were awarded to the defendants.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Motion to Adjourn Hearing
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' motion to adjourn dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment' 'self Represented Litigants' 'professional Negligence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion to Adjourn Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the hearing should be adjourned on grounds of ill health of a plaintiff' "Whether affidavits provide sufficient justification for adjournment in light of Court's standard orders"]
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate 'very good reasons' for adjourning the hearing, particularly where the third plaintiff was able to participate in other proceedings at the same time. The motion was therefore dismissed and costs were awarded to the defendants.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' motion to adjourn dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ["The plaintiffs' motion is dismissed." "The defendants' costs of this motion are to be paid by the three plaintiffs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment