Sanders-Pattinson v. Goldberg [2013] NSWSC 202
Given the medical evidence of the plaintiff's incapacity, the absence of objection by the responding parties, and the interests of justice, the hearing of the motions should be adjourned and the hearing date vacated.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Adjournment of Two Motions Prior to Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Hearing of motions adjourned; hearing date vacated; matters stood over for directions; liberty to apply reserved; orders to be advised by Registrar.
- Legal Topics
- ['adjournment Application' 'interlocutory Hearings' 'in Chambers' 'medical Incapacity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Adjournment of Two Motions Prior to Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the hearing of the interlocutory motions should be adjourned due to the plaintiff's medical incapacity."]
Ratio Decidendi
Given the medical evidence of the plaintiff's incapacity, the absence of objection by the responding parties, and the interests of justice, the hearing of the motions should be adjourned and the hearing date vacated.
Court Disposition
Hearing of motions adjourned; hearing date vacated; matters stood over for directions; liberty to apply reserved; orders to be advised by Registrar.
Orders
- ['The hearing of the motions filed on 9th July 2012 and 10th September 2012, respectively, fixed for hearing on 22nd March 2013, is adjourned and the hearing date vacated.' 'The motions and the proceedings are stood over for directions before the Common Law Registrar on Friday, 3rd May 2013 at 9 a.m.' 'Reserve...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment