Woodhouse (Administrator), in the matter of Panoramic Resources Limited [2024] FCA 22

Woodhouse (Administrator), in the matter of Panoramic Resources Limited [2024] FCA 22

A six-month extension for convening second creditors’ meetings is appropriate given the complexity, ongoing sale process, absence of material prejudice to creditors, and in order to enhance the prospect of maximising returns for stakeholders. Administrators’ views and supporting evidence justify the extension.

Parties
Administrators (first Plaintiffs): Daniel Woodhouse, Hayden White and Kate Warwick; Second Plaintiff: Panoramic Resources Limited (ACN 095 792 288) (Administrators Appointed); Third Plaintiff: Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd (ACN 103 729 282) (Administrators Appointed); Fourth Plaintiff: PAN Transport Pty Ltd (ACN 627 691 598) (Administrators Appointed); Fifth Plaintiff: Pindan Exploration Company Pty Ltd (ACN 129 252 197) (Administrators Appointed)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Corporations Administration / Application for Extension of Time to Convene Second Meetings of Creditors
Outcome
Extension granted
Legal Topics
Administrators’ Duties, Extension of Convening Period, Creditors’ Meetings, Sale of Business, Employee Entitlements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Woodhouse, Hayden White and Kate Warwick

Administrators (first Plaintiffs)

Panoramic Resources Limited (ACN 095 792 288) (Administrators Appointed)

Second Plaintiff

Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd (ACN 103 729 282) (Administrators Appointed)

Third Plaintiff

PAN Transport Pty Ltd (ACN 627 691 598) (Administrators Appointed)

Fourth Plaintiff

Pindan Exploration Company Pty Ltd (ACN 129 252 197) (Administrators Appointed)

Fifth Plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Corporations Administration / Application for Extension of Time to Convene Second Meetings of Creditors

  1. 1 Whether time for convening second meetings of creditors should be extended
  2. 2 Whether the extension facilitates a sale process and maximises creditor returns
  3. 3 Potential prejudice to stakeholders from extension

Ratio Decidendi

A six-month extension for convening second creditors’ meetings is appropriate given the complexity, ongoing sale process, absence of material prejudice to creditors, and in order to enhance the prospect of maximising returns for stakeholders. Administrators’ views and supporting evidence justify the extension.

Court Disposition

Extension granted

Orders

  • The period within which the Administrators must convene the second meeting of creditors of each company is extended to midnight AWST on 23 July 2024.
  • Second meetings may be held together or separately within the extended convening period, provided notice is given in accordance with r 75-225(1) and r 75-15 of the IPR.