Woodhouse (Administrator), in the matter of Panoramic Resources Limited [2024] FCA 22
A six-month extension for convening second creditors’ meetings is appropriate given the complexity, ongoing sale process, absence of material prejudice to creditors, and in order to enhance the prospect of maximising returns for stakeholders. Administrators’ views and supporting evidence justify the extension.
- Parties
- Administrators (first Plaintiffs): Daniel Woodhouse, Hayden White and Kate Warwick; Second Plaintiff: Panoramic Resources Limited (ACN 095 792 288) (Administrators Appointed); Third Plaintiff: Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd (ACN 103 729 282) (Administrators Appointed); Fourth Plaintiff: PAN Transport Pty Ltd (ACN 627 691 598) (Administrators Appointed); Fifth Plaintiff: Pindan Exploration Company Pty Ltd (ACN 129 252 197) (Administrators Appointed)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Administration / Application for Extension of Time to Convene Second Meetings of Creditors
- Outcome
- Extension granted
- Legal Topics
- Administrators’ Duties, Extension of Convening Period, Creditors’ Meetings, Sale of Business, Employee Entitlements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Woodhouse, Hayden White and Kate Warwick
Administrators (first Plaintiffs)
Panoramic Resources Limited (ACN 095 792 288) (Administrators Appointed)
Second Plaintiff
Savannah Nickel Mines Pty Ltd (ACN 103 729 282) (Administrators Appointed)
Third Plaintiff
PAN Transport Pty Ltd (ACN 627 691 598) (Administrators Appointed)
Fourth Plaintiff
Pindan Exploration Company Pty Ltd (ACN 129 252 197) (Administrators Appointed)
Fifth Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Corporations Administration / Application for Extension of Time to Convene Second Meetings of Creditors
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether time for convening second meetings of creditors should be extended
- 2 Whether the extension facilitates a sale process and maximises creditor returns
- 3 Potential prejudice to stakeholders from extension
Ratio Decidendi
A six-month extension for convening second creditors’ meetings is appropriate given the complexity, ongoing sale process, absence of material prejudice to creditors, and in order to enhance the prospect of maximising returns for stakeholders. Administrators’ views and supporting evidence justify the extension.
Court Disposition
Extension granted
Orders
- The period within which the Administrators must convene the second meeting of creditors of each company is extended to midnight AWST on 23 July 2024.
- Second meetings may be held together or separately within the extended convening period, provided notice is given in accordance with r 75-225(1) and r 75-15 of the IPR.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment