In the Matter of Maiden Civil Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1618
The documents tendered (MFI03 and MFI04) were not admissible as business records because there was no sufficient evidence they were kept in the course of business for the relevant entities; nor could their authenticity be reliably inferred from their production or face alone. MFI04 was further excluded as it was prepared in contemplation of the present proceedings, engaging s 69(3) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications / Rulings on Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Tender of MFI03 and MFI04 rejected. Evidence ruled inadmissible.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Business Records' 'authentication of Documents' 'hearsay Rule Exception' 'evidence Act 1995 (nsw) S 69']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications / Rulings on Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether business records are admissible under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)' 'Whether the provenance or authenticity of business records can be inferred from the face of the document or requires external proof' 'Whether s 69(3) excludes documents prepared in contemplation of proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The documents tendered (MFI03 and MFI04) were not admissible as business records because there was no sufficient evidence they were kept in the course of business for the relevant entities; nor could their authenticity be reliably inferred from their production or face alone. MFI04 was further excluded as it was prepared in contemplation of the present proceedings, engaging s 69(3) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Tender of MFI03 and MFI04 rejected. Evidence ruled inadmissible.
Orders
- ['MFI03 rejected.' 'MFI04 rejected.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment