Police v Parker [2013] NSWLC 10
The incident involving the accused driving into a flooded creek was an unfortunate mishap constituting an accident; the accused's subsequent hospitalisation for hypothermia was a consequence of that accident, making him an 'accident patient' under the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999. Accordingly, the certificates as to the taking of a blood sample and its analysis are admissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Certificates' "definition of 'accident Patient' Under Road Transport (safety and Traffic Management) Act" 'taking and Analysis of Blood Sample Following Motor Vehicle Incident']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the accused was an 'accident patient' under the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999" 'Whether certificates as to the taking of a blood sample and its analysis are admissible as evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
The incident involving the accused driving into a flooded creek was an unfortunate mishap constituting an accident; the accused's subsequent hospitalisation for hypothermia was a consequence of that accident, making him an 'accident patient' under the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999. Accordingly, the certificates as to the taking of a blood sample and its analysis are admissible.
Court Disposition
Evidence admitted
Orders
- ['Certificates relating to the taking of a blood sample and its analysis are admitted into evidence.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment