R v Macdonald; R v Edward Obeid; R v Moses Obeid (No 12) [2020] NSWSC 1946

R v Macdonald; R v Edward Obeid; R v Moses Obeid (No 12) [2020] NSWSC 1946

The court ruled that the Phone Summary, as edited, is admissible under s 50 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) because it summarises complex primary phone records, the complexity justifies summarisation, and the accused have had reasonable opportunity to examine the source materials. The summary is capable of rationally affecting assessment of the probability of the conspiracy and participation of the accused, and is not rendered inadmissible merely because alternative innocent explanations of contact were available. Any unfairness or overweighting of probative value can be addressed in submissions and in the judge's assessment.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 October 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Outcome
Phone Summary admitted as documentary evidence.
Legal Topics
['admissibility of Documentary Evidence' 'summary of Phone Records' 'section 50 Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)']
['evidence' 'criminal Law'] ['admissibility of Documentary Evidence' 'summary of Phone Records' 'section 50 Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Phone Summary is admissible under s 50 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)' 'Whether the Phone Summary is relevant under s 55 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)' 'Whether the summary is unfairly prejudicial or speculative']

Ratio Decidendi

The court ruled that the Phone Summary, as edited, is admissible under s 50 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) because it summarises complex primary phone records, the complexity justifies summarisation, and the accused have had reasonable opportunity to examine the source materials. The summary is capable of rationally affecting assessment of the probability of the conspiracy and participation of the accused, and is not rendered inadmissible merely because alternative innocent explanations of contact were available. Any unfairness or overweighting of probative value can be addressed in submissions and in the judge's assessment.

Court Disposition

Phone Summary admitted as documentary evidence.

Orders

  • ['Phone Summary (MFI 88) is admitted as evidence.']