REGINA v. JUNG [2006] NSWSC 661

REGINA v. JUNG [2006] NSWSC 661

The ERISP was admissible because the accused was provided with and benefited from a competent interpreter, was fully informed of his rights, demonstrated understanding and voluntary participation, and there was no evidence of compulsion, misunderstanding, or police impropriety affecting the reliability of the admissions.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Myoung Il Jung
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 June 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Voir Dire on Admissibility of Evidence
Outcome
The ERISP is admissible.
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Electronically Recorded Interviews, Unfairness Discretion, Evidence of Admissions, Interpreter Use in Police Interviews
Criminal Law Evidence Admissibility of Electronically Recorded Interviews Unfairness Discretion Evidence of Admissions Interpreter Use in Police Interviews

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Myoung Il Jung

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Voir Dire on Admissibility of Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the ERISP (Electronically Recorded Interview of Suspected Person) is admissible under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) sections 85 and 90
  2. 2 Whether the accused understood the interview and his rights
  3. 3 Whether any unfairness rendered the admission inadmissible

Ratio Decidendi

The ERISP was admissible because the accused was provided with and benefited from a competent interpreter, was fully informed of his rights, demonstrated understanding and voluntary participation, and there was no evidence of compulsion, misunderstanding, or police impropriety affecting the reliability of the admissions.

Court Disposition

The ERISP is admissible.