R v Kaine [2013] NSWSC 1823

R v Kaine [2013] NSWSC 1823

The exclusion of the evidence is based on the finding that its limited probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, particularly as it would invite impermissible tendency reasoning from a single, remote incident, and there is sufficient uncontested evidence of the accused’s hatred of paedophiles available for relevant opinion evidence.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling During Trial
Outcome
evidence excluded
Legal Topics
['admissibility of Evidence' 'probative Value Vs Prejudicial Effect' 'murder' 'partial Defence of Substantial Impairment']
['criminal Law' 'evidence'] ['admissibility of Evidence' 'probative Value Vs Prejudicial Effect' 'murder' 'partial Defence of Substantial Impairment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Evidentiary Ruling During Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether evidence of prior violent incident towards person perceived as a paedophile should be admitted' 'Whether probative value of such evidence outweighs prejudicial effect' 'Whether the evidence would invite impermissible tendency reasoning']

Ratio Decidendi

The exclusion of the evidence is based on the finding that its limited probative value is outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, particularly as it would invite impermissible tendency reasoning from a single, remote incident, and there is sufficient uncontested evidence of the accused’s hatred of paedophiles available for relevant opinion evidence.

Court Disposition

evidence excluded

Orders

  • ['Objection upheld; evidence of prior violent incident excluded from trial.']