R v Qaumi & Ors (No 22) [2016] NSWSC 403
Photograph 17 was excluded because it had no probative value beyond that of photograph 15 and a close-up view could arouse emotional responses; the ISRAPS presentation was admitted as its probative value outweighed any potential prejudice, being a useful tool for understanding the crime scene.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Farhad Qaumi; Accused: Mumtaz Qaumi; Accused: Jamil Qaumi; Accused: Mohammed Zarshoy; Accused: Mohammed Kalal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling During Trial
- Outcome
- Photograph 17 excluded; ISRAPS presentation admitted over objection.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Evidence, Exclusion of Prejudicial Evidence, Use of Visual Evidence in Jury Trials, Jury Access to Exhibits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Farhad Qaumi
Accused
Mumtaz Qaumi
Accused
Jamil Qaumi
Accused
Mohammed Zarshoy
Accused
Mohammed Kalal
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 whether photograph 17 should be excluded due to lack of probative value and potential prejudice
- 2 whether the ISRAPS presentation should be admitted or excluded due to potential unfair prejudice
Ratio Decidendi
Photograph 17 was excluded because it had no probative value beyond that of photograph 15 and a close-up view could arouse emotional responses; the ISRAPS presentation was admitted as its probative value outweighed any potential prejudice, being a useful tool for understanding the crime scene.
Court Disposition
Photograph 17 excluded; ISRAPS presentation admitted over objection.
Orders
- Photograph 17 excluded from evidence.
- ISRAPS presentation admitted and jury allowed access, subject to later review if issues arise.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment