R (Commonwealth) v Mark William Standen [2011] NSWSC 1044

R (Commonwealth) v Mark William Standen [2011] NSWSC 1044

All disputed documents ruled admissible are relevant and have substantial probative force as evidence without causing unfair prejudice or procedural unfairness to the accused.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Accused: Mark William Standen
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Documents admitted into evidence
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Evidence, Probative Value, Unfair Prejudice
Criminal Law Admissibility of Evidence Probative Value Unfair Prejudice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Mark William Standen

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the disputed Crime Commission documents should be admitted into evidence
  2. 2 Whether their admission causes unfair prejudice or procedural unfairness

Ratio Decidendi

All disputed documents ruled admissible are relevant and have substantial probative force as evidence without causing unfair prejudice or procedural unfairness to the accused.

Court Disposition

Documents admitted into evidence

Orders

  • All disputed documents ruled admissible are to be admitted into evidence