R v Warwick (No.54) [2018] NSWSC 1716
Mr Barnes' report, although predating the Expert Witness Code of Conduct and not fully addressing its requirements, is admissible on the voir dire because the expert is sufficiently qualified, the bases for his opinions are disclosed and substantiated, relevant documents were produced, and the evidence complies with the fundamental rules under s 79 of the Evidence Act 1995.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Voir Dire
- Outcome
- report admitted as evidence
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Expert Evidence' 'compliance With Expert Witness Code of Conduct' 'procedural Ruling']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Voir Dire
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Mr Barnes' expert report is admissible despite alleged non-compliance with the Expert Witness Code of Conduct" "Whether the assumptions and reasoning in Mr Barnes' report are adequately established" 'Whether the Crown complied with subpoenas for production of documents underlying the report']
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Barnes' report, although predating the Expert Witness Code of Conduct and not fully addressing its requirements, is admissible on the voir dire because the expert is sufficiently qualified, the bases for his opinions are disclosed and substantiated, relevant documents were produced, and the evidence complies with the fundamental rules under s 79 of the Evidence Act 1995.
Court Disposition
report admitted as evidence
Orders
- ['Report of Mr Barnes of 23 November 1985 admitted and marked V.D.31']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment