R v J Lucas; R v B Lucas (No 7) [2022] NSWSC 1814

R v J Lucas; R v B Lucas (No 7) [2022] NSWSC 1814

The expert evidence concerning extreme right-wing ideology, organisation, and symbols is relevant and sufficiently connected to the issues for trial, in particular the allegation of preparation for acts of politically motivated violence, and is therefore admissible. The witnesses are qualified, and their evidence meets both the relevance and expert opinion provisions in the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Evidentiary Ruling on Admissibility of Expert Evidence
Outcome
Expert evidence is admissible
Legal Topics
['admissibility of Expert Evidence' 'right Wing Extremism' 'relevance of Expert Testimony' 'evidence Act 1995 (nsw)']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Pre Trial Evidentiary Ruling on Admissibility of Expert Evidence

  1. 1 ['Whether expert evidence about extreme right-wing ideology, symbols, and organisations is admissible' 'Whether such evidence is relevant to the issues to be determined by the jury' 'Whether the expert evidence goes beyond what is necessary or is cloaked with undue authority']

Ratio Decidendi

The expert evidence concerning extreme right-wing ideology, organisation, and symbols is relevant and sufficiently connected to the issues for trial, in particular the allegation of preparation for acts of politically motivated violence, and is therefore admissible. The witnesses are qualified, and their evidence meets both the relevance and expert opinion provisions in the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).

Court Disposition

Expert evidence is admissible

Orders

  • ['The expert evidence of Dr Campion and Ms Mendelson is admissible']