R v Warwick (No.46) [2018] NSWSC 1335
Reports and worksheets were admissible unconditionally for tests conducted by Mr Goetz, and provisionally for tests and opinions not conducted by him, consistent with Evidence Act 1995 s 57.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Accused: Leonard John Warwick
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Document admitted into evidence; parts provisionally admitted.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Forensic Reports, Hearsay Objection, Provisional Admission Under Evidence Act S 57
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Leonard John Warwick
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether reports and worksheets recording results of blood tests are admissible as evidence
- 2 Admissibility of opinions based on tests not personally conducted by expert
- 3 Hearsay objections to forensic evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Reports and worksheets were admissible unconditionally for tests conducted by Mr Goetz, and provisionally for tests and opinions not conducted by him, consistent with Evidence Act 1995 s 57.
Court Disposition
Document admitted into evidence; parts provisionally admitted.
Orders
- Except for the results of two specified tests and the opinion expressed by Mr Goetz in the last sentence of the draft report, the document is admitted unconditionally and marked Exh 95.
- Insofar as Exh 95 records the results of testing which Mr Goetz did not undertake and the opinion which he then expressed, the document will be admitted provisionally, depending upon findings to be made in the future about those test results and that opinion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment