R v Phung and Huynh [2001] NSWSC 115

R v Phung and Huynh [2001] NSWSC 115

The records of interview were excluded because the combination of procedural irregularities—including failure to properly advise or provide the juvenile accused with a competent, fully informed support person and failure to ensure legal advice—amounted to such non-compliance with statutory protections as to require exclusion under ss 90 and 138 of the Evidence Act, so as to avoid unfairness to the accused.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Johnny Phung; Accused: Thang Minh Huynh
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence (voir Dire)
Outcome
Records of Interview rejected (excluded from evidence)
Legal Topics
Admissibility of Records of Interview, Statutory Compliance for Juvenile Accused, Role of Support Person, Police Procedures, Exclusion of Evidence Under Evidence Act
Criminal Law Evidence Admissibility of Records of Interview Statutory Compliance for Juvenile Accused Role of Support Person Police Procedures Exclusion of Evidence Under Evidence Act

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Johnny Phung

Accused

Thang Minh Huynh

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence (voir Dire)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether records of interview with juvenile accused were admissible given statutory requirements
  2. 2 Whether rights of the juvenile accused were sufficiently protected during police interview procedures
  3. 3 Whether non-compliance with statutory regime (support person, legal advice, etc.) required exclusion of evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The records of interview were excluded because the combination of procedural irregularities—including failure to properly advise or provide the juvenile accused with a competent, fully informed support person and failure to ensure legal advice—amounted to such non-compliance with statutory protections as to require exclusion under ss 90 and 138 of the Evidence Act, so as to avoid unfairness to the accused.

Court Disposition

Records of Interview rejected (excluded from evidence)