Dent v Moore [1919] HCA 11
Where a party's claim depends on a written agreement required to be stamped, and the agreement is unstamped, the party is precluded by the Stamp Duties Act from proving the agreement, whether by production, secondary evidence, or admissions. The statutory bar applies to any attempt, direct or indirect, to make such an instrument available or effectual, including through admissions or collateral documents reciting the agreement.
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Brian Ludlow Moore; Defendant/appellant: John Irwin Dent
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 1919
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (appeal) / On Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Verdict entered for the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Unstamped Instrument, Proof of Contract Reduced to Writing, Commission for Sale of Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Ludlow Moore
Plaintiff/respondent
John Irwin Dent
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil (appeal) / On Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an unstamped agreement for sale can be proved by admission or collateral documents to claim commission
- 2 Whether secondary evidence or admissions can circumvent the requirements of the Stamp Duties Act 1898 (NSW), sec. 15
Ratio Decidendi
Where a party's claim depends on a written agreement required to be stamped, and the agreement is unstamped, the party is precluded by the Stamp Duties Act from proving the agreement, whether by production, secondary evidence, or admissions. The statutory bar applies to any attempt, direct or indirect, to make such an instrument available or effectual, including through admissions or collateral documents reciting the agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Verdict entered for the defendant.
Orders
- Order appealed from discharged with costs.
- Verdict entered for the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment