Issa v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2022] NSWCATOD 159
The correct and preferable decision was to set aside the refusal because the Act and Instrument did not require experience in a new residential build or in every sequential step of constructing a house, and did not justify excluding remedial, refurbishment, commercial or non-habitable work merely for those reasons. Accepting the evidence of the Applicant and Mr Van Den Heuvel, the Applicant's supervised project management experience, particularly at 5-7 The Esplanade, Elizabeth Bay over 24 months together with overlapping projects, demonstrated at least two years' relevant industry experience in a wide range of building construction work and showed that he was capable of doing and...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review of Refusal of Application for an Individual Endorsed Contractor Licence in the Category of General Building Work / Decision After Hearing and Written Submissions
- Outcome
- The Respondent's decision was set aside and the Applicant's application for an individual endorsed contractor licence was ordered to be granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['contractor Licence' 'endorsed Contractor Licence' 'general Building Work' 'supervisor Certificate' 'relevant Industry Experience' 'wide Range of Building Construction Work' 'remedial Building Work' 'residential Building Work']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review of Refusal of Application for an Individual Endorsed Contractor Licence in the Category of General Building Work / Decision After Hearing and Written Submissions
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Applicant had at least two years' relevant industry experience in a wide range of building construction work, with the majority obtained within 10 years of the licence application." 'Whether remedial, refurbishment, commercial, or non-habitable construction work could be considered relevant experience for the purposes of the Act and Instrument.' 'Whether the Applicant was supervised and directed by the nominated supervisor as required by the Instrument.' 'Whether the Applicant was capable of doing or supervising the work for which an individual endorsed contractor licence in general building work is required.']
Ratio Decidendi
The correct and preferable decision was to set aside the refusal because the Act and Instrument did not require experience in a new residential build or in every sequential step of constructing a house, and did not justify excluding remedial, refurbishment, commercial or non-habitable work merely for those reasons. Accepting the evidence of the Applicant and Mr Van Den Heuvel, the Applicant's supervised project management experience, particularly at 5-7 The Esplanade, Elizabeth Bay over 24 months together with overlapping projects, demonstrated at least two years' relevant industry experience in a wide range of building construction work and showed that he was capable of doing and...
Court Disposition
The Respondent's decision was set aside and the Applicant's application for an individual endorsed contractor licence was ordered to be granted.
Orders
- ["The Respondent's decision to refuse the Applicant's application for a contractor licence is set aside." "In substitution for the Respondent's decision, the Applicant's application for a contractor licence is to be granted." 'The Respondent is to effect the grant of the individual endorsed contractor licence to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment