Adrem Nominees Pty Limited v Auburn City Council [2012] NSWLEC 1043
The court upheld the appeal and granted consent, finding the conditions requiring easement creation for public access to Duck River consistent with LEP and DCP provisions and valid in law. The condition restricting placement of building materials was also reasonable given safety and amenity considerations.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, conditional consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'easement Creation' 'riparian Zone Management' 'conditions on Building Material Placement']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Validity of condition requiring easement creation for public foreshore access' 'Appropriateness of conditions on placement of building materials on public roadway']
Ratio Decidendi
The court upheld the appeal and granted consent, finding the conditions requiring easement creation for public access to Duck River consistent with LEP and DCP provisions and valid in law. The condition restricting placement of building materials was also reasonable given safety and amenity considerations.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, conditional consent granted
Orders
- ['Appeal upheld.' 'Development consent granted to DA - 135/2011 for alterations and additions to existing industrial development including construction of 5 new buildings and associated works at 305 and 305A Parramatta Road, Auburn subject to conditions in Annexure A.' 'Exhibits may be returned except 1, 3, A, B, C...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment