Praljak v Office of the Australian Information Commissioner [2024] FCA 1487

Praljak v Office of the Australian Information Commissioner [2024] FCA 1487

The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the substantial delay and the proposed application for judicial review was without merit, so the application for extension of time was dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Adrian Praljak; First Respondent: Office of the Australian Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Minter Ellison
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Privacy, Practice and Procedure
Administrative Law Extension of Time Judicial Review Privacy Practice and Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adrian Praljak

Applicant

Office of the Australian Information Commissioner

First Respondent

Minter Ellison

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in applying for judicial review
  2. 2 Whether the proposed judicial review application has merit

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for the substantial delay and the proposed application for judicial review was without merit, so the application for extension of time was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application to extend time, accepted for filing on 10 September 2024, is dismissed.