R v Attwater; R v Maris [2017] NSWSC 1710
Both offenders committed objectively serious acts: Attwater’s aggravated sexual assault and manslaughter occurred during non-consensual intercourse with an unconscious or severely intoxicated woman, while Maris’s oral intercourse occurred under the same conditions, plus he destroyed evidence to hinder investigation. Both acted with high moral culpability; absence of remorse and lack of insight limited mitigation, and only moderate reduction in sentence was warranted for delay in prosecution. Long aggregate custodial sentences were required for both deterrence and denunciation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdict
- Outcome
- Attwater: aggregate term of imprisonment 19 years from 5 September 2017, non-parole 14 years 3 months. Maris: aggregate term of imprisonment 9 years from 5 September 2017, non-parole 6 years 9 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'manslaughter' 'aggravated Sexual Assault' 'hindering Investigation' 'consent' 'intoxication' 'delay in Prosecution' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing After Jury Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sexual intercourse was non-consensual and whether the offenders knew of lack of consent' 'Whether the degree of intoxication negated the capacity for consent' 'Objective seriousness of offences and moral culpability' 'Impact of delay in prosecution on sentencing' 'Appropriate aggregate sentences considering totality and non-parole periods']
Ratio Decidendi
Both offenders committed objectively serious acts: Attwater’s aggravated sexual assault and manslaughter occurred during non-consensual intercourse with an unconscious or severely intoxicated woman, while Maris’s oral intercourse occurred under the same conditions, plus he destroyed evidence to hinder investigation. Both acted with high moral culpability; absence of remorse and lack of insight limited mitigation, and only moderate reduction in sentence was warranted for delay in prosecution. Long aggregate custodial sentences were required for both deterrence and denunciation.
Court Disposition
Attwater: aggregate term of imprisonment 19 years from 5 September 2017, non-parole 14 years 3 months. Maris: aggregate term of imprisonment 9 years from 5 September 2017, non-parole 6 years 9 months.
Orders
- ['Attwater: aggregate sentence of 19 years imprisonment to commence 5 September 2017, non-parole period 14 years 3 months; eligible for parole 4 December 2031; sentence expires 4 September 2036.' 'Maris: aggregate sentence of 9 years imprisonment to commence 5 September 2017, non-parole period 6 years 9 months;...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment