Kostov v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2020] NSWCA 73
The Court directed that the issue of whether leave under the Vexatious Proceedings Act was required to institute the judicial review proceedings and the consequences of not obtaining such leave should be determined after both parties file and exchange written submissions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Directions Hearing
- Outcome
- Directions made; first respondent substituted; timetable for submissions set; no final determination.
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Proceedings' 'judicial Review' 'substitution of Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Directions Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave under the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW) was required to commence judicial review proceedings' 'Consequences of failure to obtain such leave']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court directed that the issue of whether leave under the Vexatious Proceedings Act was required to institute the judicial review proceedings and the consequences of not obtaining such leave should be determined after both parties file and exchange written submissions.
Court Disposition
Directions made; first respondent substituted; timetable for submissions set; no final determination.
Orders
- ["Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) substituted for 'Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions' as first respondent." 'Both parties to file and exchange written submissions by 4.00pm on Monday 27 April 2020 on whether leave under Vexatious Proceedings Act was required and the consequences of failure to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment