R v Manna [1999] NSWCCA 314

R v Manna [1999] NSWCCA 314

By majority, the Court held that the sentencing judge did not err in concluding no direct relationship between the applicant's psychiatric history and the offence, and that the sentence was severe but not outside appropriate parameters given the gravity of offending. The appeal was dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Adriano Manna; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 December 1999
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal dismissed by majority
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Wounding With Intent to Murder, Mental Disorder and Criminal Responsibility
Criminal Law Sentencing Wounding With Intent to Murder Mental Disorder and Criminal Responsibility

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adriano Manna

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding the applicant's psychiatric history provided no explanation for the commission of the offence
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

By majority, the Court held that the sentencing judge did not err in concluding no direct relationship between the applicant's psychiatric history and the offence, and that the sentence was severe but not outside appropriate parameters given the gravity of offending. The appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed by majority