AD'TEL v RSL [2001] NSWSC 371

AD'TEL v RSL [2001] NSWSC 371

A reasonably wide interpretation of paragraph 17 of Mr Thompson's affidavit was adopted, allowing an offsetting claim for three substantiated amounts totalling $84,247.22, together with a further reduction for $18,748.01 obtained by garnishee. The unsupported $48,000 claim was not accepted. The demand was therefore varied to $223,042.95 rather than set aside.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside a Statutory Demand / Judgment on Application
Outcome
Statutory demand varied by reducing the amount to $223,042.95; plaintiff ordered to pay two-thirds of the defendant's costs of the application.
Legal Topics
['statutory Demand' 'offsetting Claim' 'variation of Demand' 'costs']
['corporations Law'] ['statutory Demand' 'offsetting Claim' 'variation of Demand' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside a Statutory Demand / Judgment on Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the statutory demand served by the defendant on the plaintiff should be set aside or reduced by reason of an offsetting claim.' 'Whether the offsetting claim identified in affidavits was within the matters foreshadowed in the affidavit filed within time.' 'Whether amounts claimed for alleged losses were sufficiently substantiated.']

Ratio Decidendi

A reasonably wide interpretation of paragraph 17 of Mr Thompson's affidavit was adopted, allowing an offsetting claim for three substantiated amounts totalling $84,247.22, together with a further reduction for $18,748.01 obtained by garnishee. The unsupported $48,000 claim was not accepted. The demand was therefore varied to $223,042.95 rather than set aside.

Court Disposition

Statutory demand varied by reducing the amount to $223,042.95; plaintiff ordered to pay two-thirds of the defendant's costs of the application.

Orders

  • ['The demand is varied by reducing the amount to $223,042.95.' 'The demand is declared to be varied from the time it was served on the plaintiff company.' "The plaintiff is to pay two-thirds of the defendant's costs of the application." 'The exhibits may be returned.']