ADY17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 717
Despite accepting the applicant's explanation for the short delay, the Court found that the proposed grounds of appeal lacked reasonable prospects of success, as they failed to identify errors of law or sufficient factual or procedural errors by the Tribunal; thus, the application for an extension of time was dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'protection Visas' 'judicial Review Criteria' 'refugee Claims' 'tribunal Decision' 'grounds of Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an extension of time to file a notice of appeal should be granted' 'Whether the proposed grounds of appeal disclose sufficient merit or prospects of success']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite accepting the applicant's explanation for the short delay, the Court found that the proposed grounds of appeal lacked reasonable prospects of success, as they failed to identify errors of law or sufficient factual or procedural errors by the Tribunal; thus, the application for an extension of time was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time be dismissed with costs as assessed or agreed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment