AEB15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 178

AEB15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 178

The applicant demonstrated an arguable ground of appeal concerning whether the Tribunal erred in addressing the implications of extortion and significant harm, and in light of the short delay and lack of prejudice to the respondent, an extension of time should be granted.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time From Federal Circuit Court Judgment
Outcome
Extension of time granted
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'jurisdictional Error' 'significant Harm' 'extortion' 'protection Visa']
['migration'] ['extension of Time' 'jurisdictional Error' 'significant Harm' 'extortion' 'protection Visa']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Application for Extension of Time From Federal Circuit Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether extension of time to appeal should be granted for an immigration decision' 'Whether applicant has demonstrated an arguable ground of appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated an arguable ground of appeal concerning whether the Tribunal erred in addressing the implications of extortion and significant harm, and in light of the short delay and lack of prejudice to the respondent, an extension of time should be granted.

Court Disposition

Extension of time granted

Orders

  • ['An extension of time is granted to the applicant of 14 days from the date of publication of these orders for the filing of a notice of appeal from the orders and judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia in AEB15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2166.' 'No order is made as to costs.']