AESK Investments Pty Ltd v Wollondilly Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1754
As the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied the Court could have made the decision, orders were made to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement.
- Parties
- Applicant: AESK Investments Pty Ltd; Respondent: Wollondilly Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Class 1 Development Application / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; consent granted on agreed terms under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Section 34 Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AESK Investments Pty Ltd
Applicant
Wollondilly Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Class 1 Development Application / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 could be reached and orders made accordingly
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied the Court could have made the decision, orders were made to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; consent granted on agreed terms under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Orders
- The appeal is upheld
- Development consent is granted to DA No. 10.2017.259.1 for demolition of structures and the subdivision of 2 lots into 30 lots at 78-80 River Road, Tahmoor, subject to conditions in Annexure 'A' inclusive of general terms of approval from Subsidence Advisory NSW at Annexure 'B'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment