AF v Healthquest & Another [2011] NSWADT 99
The information collected by the respondent from the RTA about the applicant, comprising medical records, sick leave data, and correspondence, was not about the applicant’s suitability for employment but rather concerned her health and related administrative issues. The respondent breached Health Privacy Principle 3 by collecting information from sources other than the applicant where it was practical and reasonable to obtain it directly from her. Disclosures of information by the respondent to the RTA did not breach privacy legislation as they fell within statutory exceptions under s.18 of the PPIP Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: AF; Respondent: Healthquest; Third Party: Minister for Health NSW
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Privacy Complaint / First Instance Decision
- Outcome
- Partial success for applicant on breach of HPP 3; other claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Health Records Privacy, Collection of Health Information, Employment Related Exemptions Under Privacy Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AF
Applicant
Healthquest
Respondent
Minister for Health NSW
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Privacy Complaint / First Instance Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent collected applicant's health information in breach of Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 and Health Privacy Principle 3
- 2 Whether the information collected fell within exemptions for information about suitability for employment under privacy statutes
- 3 Whether any breach occurred in disclosure of information post-referral
Ratio Decidendi
The information collected by the respondent from the RTA about the applicant, comprising medical records, sick leave data, and correspondence, was not about the applicant’s suitability for employment but rather concerned her health and related administrative issues. The respondent breached Health Privacy Principle 3 by collecting information from sources other than the applicant where it was practical and reasonable to obtain it directly from her. Disclosures of information by the respondent to the RTA did not breach privacy legislation as they fell within statutory exceptions under s.18 of the PPIP Act.
Court Disposition
Partial success for applicant on breach of HPP 3; other claims dismissed
Orders
- On 20.06.07 the respondent acted contrary to s.11 Health Records Information and Privacy Act 2002 in that it did not comply with Health Privacy Principle 3 when collecting information about the applicant contained in the referral HQ1 dated 14.06.07 and attachments (exhibit R3 annexure 'C'), save to the extent that...
- The proceedings are listed for directions on Thursday 26 May 2011 at 02:00 pm.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment