RE Hawkins, Connie (also known as Connie Murray) EX PARTE Worrell, Ivor [1996] FCA 1169
Of the $100,000.00 to be paid to the bankrupt following bankruptcy under the maintenance agreement, one half ($50,000.00) constitutes divisible property under s 5 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, and one half ($50,000.00) is provision for maintenance and thus is income under s 139L of the Act. The characterisation depends on the intention of the parties as evidenced by the agreement.
- Parties
- Bankrupt: Connie Hawkins (also known as Connie Murray); Trustee/applicant: Ivor Worrell; Former Husband: John Watson Hawkins
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Declaration in Bankruptcy Proceeding / Final Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Declaration made as to characterisation of payments; costs to be borne by each party with trustee’s costs to be costs in administration of estate.
- Legal Topics
- After Acquired Property, Maintenance Payments, Property Divisible Among Creditors, Income Under Bankruptcy Act, Maintenance Under Family Law Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Connie Hawkins (also known as Connie Murray)
Bankrupt
Ivor Worrell
Trustee/applicant
John Watson Hawkins
Former Husband
Procedural Posture
Application for Declaration in Bankruptcy Proceeding / Final Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payments made to the bankrupt pursuant to a maintenance agreement are 'property of the bankrupt' under s 5 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966
- 2 Whether such payments are 'income' under s 139L of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and thereby subject to contribution regime in Bankruptcy
- 3 Proper characterization of the nature of maintenance payments received after bankruptcy
Ratio Decidendi
Of the $100,000.00 to be paid to the bankrupt following bankruptcy under the maintenance agreement, one half ($50,000.00) constitutes divisible property under s 5 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, and one half ($50,000.00) is provision for maintenance and thus is income under s 139L of the Act. The characterisation depends on the intention of the parties as evidenced by the agreement.
Court Disposition
Declaration made as to characterisation of payments; costs to be borne by each party with trustee’s costs to be costs in administration of estate.
Orders
- Of the $100,000.00 to be paid pursuant to the maintenance agreement dated 7 February 1995 subsequent to 8 February 1996, one half is 'the property of the bankrupt' within s 5 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 and one half is payment by way of provision for the bankrupt's maintenance, which half is 'income' within s 139L of...
- Each party bear their own costs; the costs of the trustee to be his costs in the administration of the bankrupt's estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment