AG v JB (anonymised) [2022] NSWSC 326

AG v JB (anonymised) [2022] NSWSC 326

Given the highly volatile and short-lived relationship, the evidence of domestic violence against the first defendant, her wishes regarding the cremation and location being supported by family connections, and the significant bond between mother and child, particularly in utero, the mother’s wishes should prevail. The irreconcilable differences, lack of mutually agreed arrangements, and absence of determinative religious or cultural factors require exercise of discretion in favour of the mother having carriage of the funeral and custody of the deceased child's body.

Parties
Plaintiff: AG; First Defendant: JB; Second Defendant: Health Administration Corporation
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's application dismissed; mother (first defendant) granted relief sought.
Legal Topics
Burial Rights, Funeral Arrangements, Cultural and Religious Considerations, Parental Rights After Death of Child

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 8 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AG

Plaintiff

JB

First Defendant

Health Administration Corporation

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Who should have carriage of the funeral and custody of the deceased child's body: the mother or the father?
  2. 2 Should the child be buried or cremated, considering religious, cultural, and spiritual considerations?

Ratio Decidendi

Given the highly volatile and short-lived relationship, the evidence of domestic violence against the first defendant, her wishes regarding the cremation and location being supported by family connections, and the significant bond between mother and child, particularly in utero, the mother’s wishes should prevail. The irreconcilable differences, lack of mutually agreed arrangements, and absence of determinative religious or cultural factors require exercise of discretion in favour of the mother having carriage of the funeral and custody of the deceased child's body.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application dismissed; mother (first defendant) granted relief sought.

Orders

  • Amended Summons dated 1 March 2022 dismissed.
  • Orders made in accordance with Amended Cross-Summons dated 16 March 2022, paragraphs [1] and [2]: the mother (first defendant) is to take carriage of the funeral and burial of the deceased child.